Islamabad High Court criticizes shutter down during PTI's protest call.
By - News Beat
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday expressed its dismay at the shutdown of business in the federal capital during the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) nationwide protest, dubbed the "final call". The court slammed both the government and the PTI for their actions, terming them equally harmful to public order and economic activity.
Context of protest
The protests began with PTI Chairman Imran Khan's "last call" for protests on November 24. He demanded the restoration of his party's electoral mandate, the release of detained PTI members and the withdrawal of the 26th constitutional amendment, which he claimed had strengthened it. A "dictatorship"
The growing political confrontation between the PTI and the federal government has added to the tension in Islamabad. The IHC's intervention was aimed at striking a balance between the right to protest and the need to maintain public order.
Remarks of IHC
During the hearing, the IHC emphasized that while the right to peaceful protest is constitutionally protected, it cannot come at the cost of citizens' livelihood and public convenience. The court declared the PTI's planned protest illegal, especially in light of the Belarusian president's high-level diplomatic visit on the same day. He directed the federal government to ensure law and order in the capital without affecting daily life.
The court also took exception to the premature closure of business and normal activities. He noted that such measures not only affect economic stability but also create a sense of fear among the public. The judges reiterated that both the government and opposition parties should act responsibly to avoid undermining the rights of ordinary citizens.
Implications of the shutdown
The closures imposed during the protests highlight the broader issue of balancing political expression with the public interest. Businesses in Islamabad have been hit hard by the lockdown, a situation that mirrors past instances where political unrest has hurt economic activity. Citizens also faced mobility challenges, adding to frustration with both political parties and the administration.
move on
The IHC decision serves as a reminder to all stakeholders of the need for dialogue and compromise to address political grievances. Both the government and the opposition must recognize their shared responsibility in protecting democratic principles without disrupting the lives of ordinary citizens.
This episode illustrates the importance of creating mechanisms that allow for peaceful protests without compromising public order, and ensure a stable environment for all.